Skip to main content

Reviews

Bombs Away by Triggertone

Bombs Away

EP

Triggertone

5/5

There is something particularly refreshing about a rock release that does not feel the need to overcomplicate its intentions. Rather than burying its strongest ideas beneath layers of unnecessary experimentation, Triggertone’s Bombs Away EP places its faith in sturdy songwriting, commanding riffs and performances that carry a genuine sense of conviction. Across four tracks and more than eighteen minutes of music, the band establish a sound that feels muscular and immediate, while still leaving enough room for atmosphere, melody and gradual emotional development. The EP may be compact, but it never feels slight. Each song is given enough time to breathe, with the band frequently allowing riffs, vocal passages and instrumental sections to develop naturally instead of racing towards the next chorus. Three of the four tracks approach or exceed the five minute mark, giving Bombs Away a sense of weight that would be difficult to achieve through shorter, more disposable arrangements. Triggertone are clearly interested in songs that build, shift and evolve, and that patience proves to be one of the record’s greatest strengths. Opening track Pray immediately introduces the broad foundations of the band’s identity. There is a dark, brooding quality to the song, but it is balanced by an unmistakable confidence in the way the instruments enter and begin occupying the mix. The guitars have a thick, substantial presence, while the rhythm section gives the track a grounded and deliberate pulse. It does not sound rushed or desperate to make an immediate impression. Instead, it establishes its mood carefully, drawing the listener into the record through tension and restraint. At over four and a half minutes, Pray has the space to work through several different levels of intensity. The quieter and more controlled moments make the heavier sections feel considerably larger when they arrive. This gives the song an effective sense of rise and fall, allowing it to avoid becoming one continuous wall of distortion. Triggertone understands that heaviness is often most effective when it is contrasted against space and Pray repeatedly benefits from that approach. The vocals carry a weathered seriousness that suits the instrumentation. Rather than attempting to overpower the song, the delivery sits confidently within it, reinforcing the track’s dark emotional atmosphere. There is a sense of internal conflict running through the performance, as though the song is wrestling with ideas of desperation, faith and emotional exhaustion. The title itself carries obvious spiritual implications, but the mood feels less like peaceful devotion and more like someone searching for meaning while under considerable pressure. That emotional tension gives Pray substance beyond its central riffs. It is not simply an aggressive opening statement, it feels like the beginning of a larger psychological journey. The guitars provide the physical force but the vocal performance supplies the unease. Together, they establish the central tone of Bombs Away, heavy rock music driven as much by emotion as by volume. Room 1046 follows with a slightly tighter and more direct construction. It is the shortest track on the EP, but it does not feel underdeveloped. Instead, its relatively concise running time works in its favour, giving the song a sharper sense of momentum. Where Pray gradually pulls the listener into Triggertone’s world, Room 1046 feels more immediate, bringing the guitars and rhythm section forward with greater urgency. The title creates an instant air of mystery. A numbered room can suggest many things isolation, confinement, memory, secrecy or a specific location tied to a difficult experience. The music supports that feeling of unease. There is something enclosed and claustrophobic within the track’s atmosphere, as though the song is taking place within a space that carries memories the narrator cannot escape. The central guitar work is forceful without becoming excessively cluttered. Triggertone’s riffs are generally built around impact rather than technical display, and that remains true here. The band are not attempting to overwhelm the listener with endless flourishes. The guitars instead serve the structure of the song, creating pressure around the vocal performance and helping to reinforce its darker emotional character. The rhythm section is particularly important to the success of Room 1046, The drums give the track a strong forward push, while the bass adds depth beneath the guitars without disappearing into them. There is a pleasing physicality to the production. The instruments sound connected, as though the song is being performed by musicians responding to one another rather than assembled from isolated pieces. That sense of unity gives the track a believable live energy. Although the production is controlled and polished enough to provide clarity, it never removes the rougher edges that make this style of music compelling. The guitars retain their grit, the drums retain their punch and the vocals retain their human imperfections. The result is a song that feels produced rather than sanitised. The Fade marks the EP’s most patient and expansive moment. At more than five and a half minutes, it is the longest song on Bombs Away and Triggertone use that duration to explore a more gradual, atmospheric approach. The opening feels more restrained than the surrounding tracks, creating a noticeable shift in pace and mood. Rather than immediately relying on impact, the band allow tension to develop slowly. This makes The Fade an important part of the EP’s pacing. Without it, the record could potentially have become too reliant on similar levels of aggression. Instead, the song creates a darker centrepiece, expanding the emotional range of the release and demonstrating that Triggertone are capable of sustaining attention without constantly pushing everything to maximum intensity. There is an almost mournful quality to the early sections. The guitars feel less confrontational and more reflective, while the vocals appear to carry a greater sense of resignation. The title suggests disappearance, decline or the gradual loss of something once important. That feeling is reflected within the song’s construction. It does not present its emotional weight in one sudden burst; it allows it to gather slowly, as though the full impact of the subject is only becoming clear over time. As the track develops, the instrumentation becomes denser and more forceful. The gradual increase in energy feels earned because the quieter opening has given it room to grow. By the time The Fade reaches its heavier passages, the song has already established a strong emotional foundation. The riffs therefore feel like an extension of the track’s internal tension rather than a separate attempt to inject heaviness. This is arguably where Triggertone’s songwriting is at its most effective. The band demonstrate an understanding of dynamics that goes beyond simply alternating between quiet verses and loud choruses. The transitions feel gradual, and the different sections appear connected by a consistent emotional thread. Even when the instrumentation becomes more aggressive, the underlying sadness never completely disappears. The vocal performance is also particularly strong here. There is enough restraint to preserve the track’s reflective tone, but the delivery grows alongside the instrumentation. It feels increasingly strained and exposed as the song progresses, helping The Fade become one of the EP’s most emotionally affecting moments. Closing with the title track, Bombs Away brings the record towards a forceful and suitably dramatic conclusion. There is an immediate sense that the EP has been building towards this point. The track combines the weight of Pray, the urgency of Room 1046 and the broader dynamics explored within The Fade resulting in a finale that feels representative of the record as a whole. The title suggests destruction, confrontation and the moment at which restraint is finally abandoned. That sense of release is reflected in the track’s performance. The guitars feel especially prominent, delivering riffs with a thick, aggressive tone, while the drums bring a sense of scale and momentum. The rhythm has a deliberate heaviness that prevents the track from becoming overly frantic. Triggertone want the listener to feel each impact rather than simply be overwhelmed by speed. There is also a sense of finality within the vocal delivery. Where earlier tracks often sound as though they are trapped within uncertainty or attempting to process difficult emotions, Bombs Away feels more decisive. It carries the energy of a breaking point being reached. Whether interpreted as an act of defiance, emotional collapse or destructive liberation, the song sounds committed to its central feeling. The chorus is designed to provide a strong focal point, giving the track a memorable sense of scale without abandoning the darker character established throughout the EP. Triggertone balance melody and heaviness effectively. The vocals remain accessible enough to carry the song, while the guitars continue to provide the necessary grit and pressure beneath them. One of the strongest aspects of Bombs Away is the way it maintains intensity across its extended running time. At almost five minutes, it could easily have become repetitive, but the arrangement continues to introduce changes in emphasis and dynamics. Different sections are allowed to emerge naturally, preventing the track from feeling trapped around a single riff or chorus. The closing stages give the EP the weight it needs. Rather than fading out without resolution, the track pushes towards a firm conclusion, leaving behind a sense that the record has completed a genuine journey. The finale does not necessarily offer comfort, but it does provide release. After the tension, uncertainty and reflection of the previous songs, Bombs Away feels like the moment everything finally erupts. Across the EP, the production plays a major role in maintaining consistency. The guitars are heavy and full bodied, but they do not completely dominate the mix. The bass gives the lower frequencies real substance, while the drums possess enough clarity to remain impactful during the denser sections. The vocals sit prominently without feeling disconnected from the instruments. Importantly, the production retains a degree of rawness. Bombs Away does not sound over polished or artificially perfect. The performances still contain movement, texture and personality. That matters because Triggertone’s music depends heavily on emotional credibility. A cleaner but more sterile production could easily have removed some of the urgency from these songs. The band’s musical identity sits comfortably within hard rock and alternative metal territory, drawing upon thick guitar tones, emotionally charged vocals and arrangements that frequently move between restraint and aggression. However, Triggertone avoid sounding like a simple imitation of any one particular influence. The strongest moments come from the band’s ability to combine familiar genre foundations with their own sense of pacing and atmosphere. There is also a welcome consistency to the EP without the songs becoming interchangeable. Pray establishes the darkness and weight, Room 1046 tightens the pace, The Fade explores a more patient and emotional side and Bombs Away brings those qualities together in an explosive closing statement. Each track contributes something distinct while still belonging to the same wider body of work. The decision to keep the EP at four tracks ultimately works in Triggertone’s favour. There is no unnecessary filler and no sense that the band have stretched limited material beyond its natural lifespan. Instead, Bombs Away feels focused. Every song has a clear purpose, and the record ends before its sound begins to lose its impact. What remains after the final track is a strong impression of a band that understands the importance of patience, dynamics and emotional weight. Triggertone do not rely entirely on volume to make their music feel heavy. The tension between quieter passages and forceful riffs gives the songs their real power, while the vocals ensure that the record retains a human centre. Bombs Away is a confident and substantial EP that uses its compact tracklist intelligently. It introduces Triggertone as a band capable of writing heavy, atmospheric rock songs that are both immediate and carefully developed. From the brooding opening of Pray to the final eruption of the title track, the EP feels purposeful, cohesive and emotionally charged. Rather than simply arriving loudly and disappearing, Bombs Away leaves behind a lingering sense of tension. Its riffs make the initial impact but its darker atmosphere and gradual emotional development are what give the record lasting depth. Triggertone have created an EP that feels built to be experienced as a complete journey, with each track adding another layer to its mood before the title track brings everything crashing together.

Dark Cells by Lost Velvet

Dark Cells

ALBUM

Lost Velvet

4/5

Lost Velvet – Dark Cells Album Review There is something immediately enclosed about Dark Cells. Even before Lost Velvet begin leaning into the album’s heavier textures, the record feels as though it is taking place within a restricted emotional space. Its guitars are wide, but the world they create is claustrophobic. Its vocals are layered, but they often sound isolated. Its melodies carry traces of warmth, yet almost every moment is surrounded by a sense of distance, regret or emotional exhaustion. That contradiction sits at the centre of the album. Dark Cells is capable of sounding enormous, particularly when its distorted guitars rise into dense walls of sound but it is rarely triumphant. The scale of the music does not suggest freedom. Instead, the band use that weight to reinforce the feeling of being trapped inside memories, damaged relationships and thoughts that repeat until they become impossible to separate from reality. Across the record, Lost Velvet move between atmospheric alternative rock, shoegaze, grunge, post rock and heavier, more metallic tones. However, Dark Cells never feels like a collection of stylistic experiments. The production gives everything a shared identity. Guitars blur into one another, vocals sit deep inside the arrangements and the rhythm section provides a steady foundation without constantly forcing itself to the foreground. The result is a record that feels unified by mood rather than confined to a single genre. The opening moments of 2003 establish that mood patiently. A broad, melancholic guitar progression is allowed to breathe before the vocals arrive, immediately creating a feeling of looking backwards. There is nostalgia within the music, but it is not comforting. It resembles the unease of returning mentally to a period of life that once felt significant and discovering that the memory has become incomplete. The lyrics introduce uncertainty and disorientation, with references to running away, not knowing which direction to take and falling behind. These ideas become increasingly important as the album progresses. Lost Velvet repeatedly return to movement throughout Dark Cells, but very little of that movement leads anywhere. People run, leave, return, fall behind and attempt to start again, yet the emotional destination often remains unchanged. That gives the opening track an understated importance. It does not need a dramatic beginning because its purpose is to place the listener inside the album’s emotional environment. The vocals appear to drift through the instrumentation rather than standing above it, and the elongated delivery makes each line sound exhausted before it has even finished. Layered harmonies add scale, but the song never loses its sense of loneliness. The title track deepens that atmosphere by bringing the guitars forward with far greater weight. Dark Cells is more physical and imposing, built around a low, blunt riff and a controlled rhythm that gives the song a slow, deliberate force. There is something almost mechanical about its movement, yet the surrounding vocal textures prevent it from becoming cold. Instead, it feels like a collision between industrial pressure and dreamlike unease. Fragmented lyrical images concerning shadows and movement sit alongside the repeated act of wondering why and wondering how. The lack of a clear answer is central to the song’s impact. It feels less like a narrative and more like an obsessive thought cycle. That sense of emotional repetition continues throughout the album. Lost Velvet are not interested in presenting pain as a clear sequence with a beginning, middle and end. Their songs often feel suspended within the moment after something has gone wrong, when the mind continues returning to the same questions despite knowing that no satisfying answer is likely to arrive. The band reinforce that feeling through repetition in the arrangements. Guitar figures, vocal lines and short phrases circle repeatedly becoming heavier or more emotionally charged through persistence. This is especially effective because the repetition rarely feels like filler. It represents the album’s emotional language. These are thoughts that cannot be escaped simply because they have already been expressed once. Burnt demonstrates this from a quieter starting point. Its clean guitar pattern and slow rhythmic pulse create more space, allowing the vocals to feel slightly more exposed. The song’s concern with secrecy, lies and whether something was ever truly real brings a more personal edge to the album’s uncertainty. There is no explosive confrontation. The delivery remains controlled, almost numb, and that restraint makes the emotion more convincing. It sounds like the argument has already taken place internally many times before. The repeated idea of bringing something right back gradually takes on several meanings at once. It could represent returning pain, reclaiming power, reopening a buried conversation or dragging a concealed truth back into view. Lost Velvet often leave their lyrics open enough for those interpretations to coexist. The language across Dark Cells is generally simple and direct, but it is placed inside arrangements that make it feel ambiguous. A short phrase can sound accusatory in one moment, defeated in another and strangely comforting when it returns beneath a different guitar layer. The record becomes increasingly focused on absence and emotional abandonment. There is one of the clearest examples, opening with a thick, slightly dissonant guitar figure that immediately feels more confrontational. The repeated recognition that nobody is waiting and nobody is listening strips the song down to a painful realisation: the narrator has remained emotionally present for someone who is no longer truly there. The phrase I’m losing you again carries particular weight because of the final word. This is not a single unexpected collapse. It is part of a pattern. The relationship has either broken before or has repeatedly approached the same point of failure. That cyclical quality fits perfectly within the album’s wider structure, where emotional damage is rarely portrayed as a clean event. The song gradually becomes more forceful, but Lost Velvet resist giving it a fully cathartic release. Even at its largest, the music feels burdened rather than liberated. The repeated vocal line becomes less like a declaration and more like an acceptance of inevitability. This refusal to provide easy release is one of the strongest qualities of Dark Cells. Many albums built around emotional heaviness rely on a final explosive moment to give the listener relief. Lost Velvet are more interested in preserving tension. Their heavier passages are powerful, but they often feel like the external sound of pressure increasing rather than the pressure finally breaking. Downplay uses contrast to particularly strong effect. Its verses are relatively delicate, built around subdued bass movement, carefully spaced guitars and intimate vocals. The lyrics address somebody who refuses to speak honestly, creating the sense of a conversation that has been delayed for too long. When the guitars widen into the chorus, the change is enormous. The repeated word downplay is stretched across a dense wall of distortion, transforming the frustration hidden within the verses into something far more imposing. The dynamic shift is immediate, but it does not feel forced because the quieter sections already contain considerable tension. That balance between intimacy and scale appears throughout the album. Lost Velvet can make a restrained guitar line feel as emotionally important as a huge distorted passage. The quieter moments are not simply introductions to the heavier ones. They allow discomfort to develop in a different form. The album becomes especially direct on Brother While much of Dark Cells communicates through fragmented thoughts and abstract images, this song centres on the collapse of a relationship that once carried the weight of family. The line describing somebody as being like a brother immediately gives the emotion a more identifiable source. The sense of betrayal is made more painful by the continued presence of affection. The song does not simply condemn the other person. It remembers the closeness that existed before the damage. This makes the separation feel reluctant, even when it is clearly necessary. The instrumentation reflects that conflict. Shimmering guitars and soft harmonies initially create a mournful atmosphere before heavier layers enter beneath the vocals. The distortion does not overpower the sadness, it gives it physical weight. By the time the repeated closing phrase arrives, the song sounds caught between dismissal and grief. That emotional complexity is important because Dark Cells rarely portrays relationships in purely simple terms. The people within these songs appear capable of causing pain while remaining deeply missed. Memories are damaging, but they are also difficult to abandon. Even moments of anger seem connected to a desire for understanding. Right Back continues that desire through a more spacious and reflective arrangement. The clean guitars and restrained percussion create a hypnotic movement, giving the song the feeling of retracing familiar ground. Its references to returning to the start suggest an attempt to find the exact moment when a relationship or conversation went wrong. There is a softer quality to the vocal layering here. Elsewhere on the record, the harmonies can feel ghostly or distant. On Right Back they carry a little more warmth, even though the song remains melancholic. It briefly suggests that returning to the beginning might offer some form of clarity. However, the heavier guitar passages repeatedly interrupt that calm. These moments feel like unresolved emotion forcing itself back into the conversation. The song may want to return to something simpler, but the accumulated damage makes that impossible. This idea of attempted return becomes one of the album’s strongest recurring themes. Lost Velvet repeatedly explore the desire to rewind, repair or revisit, while making it clear that returning physically or mentally does not restore what has been lost. The past can be approached, but it cannot be entered unchanged. Half Right develops that tension through fragmented lyrics and a steady, melodic guitar foundation. Its short references to fading out, burning out and making a final attempt create the impression of emotional depletion. The words sound like pieces of thought rather than complete explanations, which suits the album’s inward looking character. As the song builds, the repeated insistence that there is no escape from the underground becomes increasingly oppressive. The underground can be interpreted as a hidden emotional state, a destructive cycle, a relationship or even a version of the self that cannot be abandoned. Lost Velvet leave the image deliberately broad, allowing it to represent any space in which someone has become trapped. The final instrumental expansion is one of the most effective passages on the album. The guitars become thicker without losing the melodic shape established earlier, creating the impression of something familiar being gradually consumed. A delicate piano ending follows, but it does not feel like peace. It is closer to the final trace left after the heavier sound has receded. The album’s production deserves considerable credit for maintaining this atmosphere across ten tracks without flattening every song into the same shape. The guitars are consistently layered and immersive, but their function changes. At times they shimmer and drift. Elsewhere they grind, pulse or descend into slow, crushing riffs. The vocals are treated almost like another instrument. They are frequently pushed into the surrounding sound rather than mixed as a separate focal point. This can make some lyrics less immediate, but it also gives the record much of its identity. The voices sound internal, as though the listener is hearing thoughts from inside the same enclosed space. That production choice is especially effective on Summer’s Gone The song carries one of the album’s largest and heaviest guitar tones, moving with a slow, almost ceremonial force. Its title might initially suggest nostalgia for a brighter season, but the music removes any expectation of warmth. Here, summer represents something already passing. It becomes another symbol for time, change and the disappearance of a period that once felt permanent. The repeated refrain has the quality of mourning, as though the narrator recognises the end of something while still being unable to detach from it. A lead guitar movement rises through the heavier rhythm without becoming a conventional display of technical ability. It bends through the arrangement like an extension of the vocal grief. This is one of several moments where Lost Velvet allow the instruments to express what the lyrics deliberately leave incomplete. The song’s repetition becomes increasingly hypnotic as it continues, but there is also a feeling of emotional stagnation. The season has gone, yet the narrator remains in the moment of its departure. That inability to move forward is present throughout the album, connecting the personal losses of Brother and There to the broader sense of time passing established by 2003 By the time Dark Cells reaches Thin Skies, the album’s emotional vocabulary has been fully established. The closing track initially feels more direct, opening with a firm riff and a clearer rhythmic push. However, the lyrics repeatedly return to the idea of nothingness, gradually emptying the song of any straightforward resolution. The repeated statements about things always having been this way, never being the same and continuing unchanged create deliberate contradiction. The narrator appears unable to decide whether everything has transformed or whether the same pattern has simply continued under a different form. That confusion feels completely appropriate for the end of the album. Dark Cells is not a record concerned with reaching clarity. It documents what happens when clarity remains unavailable. People leave without giving proper answers. Relationships collapse without a clean ending. Memories return without revealing whether they are accurate. The repetition of nothing begins as a subdued statement before becoming something far more powerful. Additional vocals and instrumental layers gradually turn the word into a chant, communicating emotional numbness more effectively than a detailed explanation could. The final choral textures give the ending a ceremonial quality, but there is no clear sense of closure. The album appears to dissolve rather than conclude. The listener is left within the same atmosphere established at the beginning, although the emotional weight of that atmosphere now feels far greater. That circular structure is one of the reasons Dark Cells works so well as a complete album. Its songs are individually distinguishable, but they feel strongest when heard as parts of the same internal journey. The record repeatedly revisits similar emotional states from slightly different angles, allowing themes of betrayal, abandonment, memory and isolation to accumulate. There are moments where the album’s consistency may initially make several tracks appear similar. Lost Velvet favour slow to mid tempo rhythms, buried vocal harmonies and arrangements that gradually expand through repeated guitar figures. However, the distinctions become clearer with closer listening. The blunt heaviness of the title track is different from the emotional directness of Brother. The explosive dynamic of Downplay serves a different purpose from the slow mourning of Summer’s Gone. The nostalgia of 2003 is not the same as the emptiness of Thin Skies, even though both are surrounded by the same production atmosphere. This is not a record built for immediate, disposable impact. Its strongest moments often reveal themselves gradually. A harmony becomes more noticeable on a later listen. A repeated lyric changes meaning once the album’s wider themes become clear. A guitar line that initially appears simple begins to carry more emotional weight because of what surrounds it. The rhythm section plays an important role in allowing that detail to emerge. The drums remain controlled throughout, providing power without constantly attempting to dominate the mix. This gives the guitars and vocals space to create atmosphere while maintaining a sense of forward movement. The album’s heaviness is therefore rarely based on speed. It comes from density, patience and repetition. Lost Velvet understand that a slowly repeated riff can become far more oppressive than a frantic one when it is given enough space. Lyrically, Dark Cells is strongest when it communicates through suggestion. The writing rarely attempts to explain every detail of the situations being described. Instead, recurring phrases and images create the impression of a larger story existing outside the songs. This approach allows the listener to place their own experiences inside the record. The relationships may be specific to Lost Velvet, but the feelings are recognisable, realising somebody is no longer listening, revisiting a conversation mentally, questioning whether something was ever genuine, watching time move forward while remaining emotionally stuck and having to separate from somebody who once felt permanent. These emotions are not presented theatrically. Even the album’s largest moments retain a degree of restraint. The vocals rarely become aggressively confrontational, and the guitars are used to support the emotional atmosphere rather than turn the record into a constant display of heaviness. That restraint ultimately makes Dark Cells feel more convincing. It sounds less like a performance of sadness and more like an attempt to live inside it long enough to understand its shape. Lost Velvet have created a record that feels bruised, reflective and deeply enclosed. Its title is appropriate not only because of the darkness within the songs, but because the album repeatedly places the listener inside small emotional rooms from which there is no obvious exit. The characters move through memories and relationships searching for answers, yet the walls remain intact. The past refuses to stay in the past, and each attempt to escape seems to lead back towards another unresolved feeling. Dark Cells does not offer comfort in a conventional sense. What it offers instead is recognition. It understands the exhausting repetition of grief, regret and emotional uncertainty. It understands that some losses do not arrive once but continue happening internally long after the other person has gone. Through its dense guitars, submerged harmonies and patient songwriting, Lost Velvet turn those feelings into something immersive. The record surrounds the listener slowly, allowing its details to become clearer while its emotional world grows increasingly difficult to leave. By its end, Dark Cells feels less like a collection of songs and more like one sustained state of mind, heavy but never needlessly aggressive, melodic without becoming comforting and deeply atmospheric without sacrificing emotional clarity. It is an album that lingers because it never fully resolves the questions it raises, leaving its shadows in place long after the final sound has faded.

Where Did I Go Wrong by Defects

Where Did I Go Wrong

SINGLE

Defects

5/5

There is a particular kind of pain that comes from watching somebody you care about slowly disappear from your life while knowing there was only so much you could do to stop it. It is not the clean heartbreak of a relationship ending with a definitive conclusion, nor is it necessarily anger directed towards another person. Sometimes it is simply the uncomfortable feeling of looking backwards and wondering whether there was a moment when everything could have changed. Where Did I Go Wrong, the latest single from Defects ahead of their forthcoming album Artificial Icons, finds the band exploring exactly that territory, delivering one of their more emotionally exposed pieces of modern metalcore without sacrificing the weight that has become such an important part of their identity. What immediately makes the song work is the question sitting at its centre. “Where did I go wrong?” is such a simple thing to ask but emotionally it can contain an enormous amount of baggage. It is the kind of question that tends to arrive when there are no easy answers left. You start replaying conversations, decisions and memories, trying to identify the point where something changed. The problem is that real life rarely provides that neat moment of explanation. Defects lean into that uncertainty rather than attempting to resolve it and that gives the song a surprisingly mature emotional character. This isn’t a track about finding somebody to blame. It is about what happens when you genuinely don’t know whether you could have done something differently. Musically, Defects manage to make that uncertainty feel physical. Their approach to modern metalcore has always depended heavily on the relationship between melody and heaviness, and Where Did I Go Wrong understands that contrast perhaps better than some of their more straightforwardly aggressive material. The guitars carry plenty of weight, but the song isn’t constructed around the idea that every available second needs to be filled with maximum aggression. There is space for the melodies to breathe, allowing the emotional content to remain the focal point. The heavier sections consequently feel more significant because they have something to push against. That restraint is important. A song dealing with regret could easily become overly sentimental if the music constantly told the listener exactly how they were supposed to feel. Defects avoid that trap Instead, the instrumentation creates an atmosphere of tension and release, allowing the listener to move between reflection and frustration. There is still that modern metallic punch underneath everything, but it feels like an extension of the emotion rather than decoration placed on top of it. The riffs have purpose, the rhythm section gives the track its forward momentum, and the melodic elements prevent the whole thing from becoming emotionally one dimensional. Tony Maue’s vocals are particularly important in maintaining that balance. There is still plenty of power in his delivery, but the song benefits from the moments where that power is allowed to become more vulnerable. The performance doesn’t feel like someone simply performing sadness for the sake of a dramatic vocal. Instead, there is a sense of somebody trying to process something that remains unresolved. That distinction makes the central idea much easier to connect with. You don’t necessarily feel like you’re being told a story from a distance, you feel like you’re being dropped into the middle of somebody’s internal conversation. That is also where Defects demonstrate their growing confidence as songwriters. The band could quite easily have taken the premise and turned it into a conventional metalcore heartbreak song, complete with obvious emotional peaks and predictable catharsis. Instead, Where Did I Go Wrong is considerably more uncomfortable than that. There isn’t necessarily a moment where everything suddenly makes sense. The question remains hanging in the air. In many ways, that is precisely what makes it believable. There is something particularly relatable about taking responsibility for things that may not entirely have been your responsibility. When somebody you care about makes choices that ultimately hurt themselves or damage the relationship between you, it is incredibly easy to start questioning your own actions. Should you have noticed sooner? Should you have pushed harder? Should you have said something different? Could you have been there more? Those questions can become almost impossible to silence, particularly when the person you were trying to help is no longer around to provide an answer. Defects capture that psychological spiral extremely well. The production reinforces the song’s modern identity without allowing it to become sterile. Everything has the clarity expected from contemporary heavy music but there remains enough weight and atmosphere for the track to feel physical. The guitars have presence, the drums provide the necessary impact and the vocals sit firmly at the centre of the mix. Most importantly, the production doesn’t obscure the songwriting. It allows the emotional idea to remain visible through all of the metallic density. There is also an interesting sense of progression when Where Did I Go Wrong is considered alongside what Defects have already revealed about Artificial Icons. The band aren’t presenting this forthcoming record as simply a continuation of Modern Error. There is a broader emotional and thematic ambition developing around the new material and this single provides a much more personal perspective within that picture. Where some of their recent songs have been capable of addressing larger subjects, this one brings everything back to an individual relationship and the consequences of feeling powerless. That makes the song an important part of the album’s wider identity. The title Artificial Icons suggests something considerably larger than a collection of personal songs, and the material released so far appears to be willing to move between societal issues, personal experiences and darker reflections on the world around us. Where Did I Go Wrong provides the human scale counterweight to those larger ideas. It reminds us that even when a band is capable of tackling enormous subjects, sometimes the most affecting material comes from something much smaller and more personal. The songwriting is arguably where the single makes its strongest impression. There is no need for Defects to overcomplicate the arrangement or bury the central message beneath technicality. The song understands the value of repetition when that repetition reflects the obsessive nature of regret. When you are genuinely questioning where something went wrong, you don’t ask the question once and move on. You ask it again and again. You approach it from another angle, find another memory, reconsider another decision. The structure of the song complements that mentality, giving the central idea room to settle rather than rushing towards a convenient conclusion. It is also refreshing that the emotional weight doesn’t come at the expense of the band’s heavier identity. Defects have built their reputation around a contemporary form of metalcore that can comfortably move between crushing guitars and accessible melodic writing, and this single doesn’t abandon that formula. Instead, it demonstrates why that formula works. The aggression gives the frustration somewhere to live, while the melody gives the regret somewhere to breathe. Perhaps the most impressive thing about Where Did I Go Wrong, however, is that it doesn’t attempt to make its protagonist completely innocent. There is an acknowledgement within the song’s premise that maybe something could have been done differently. That ambiguity makes the emotional perspective considerably more convincing. Real relationships are rarely as simple as one person being right and another being wrong. Sometimes both people contribute to a breakdown without fully understanding what they are doing at the time. Sometimes circumstances simply become too complicated. And sometimes you can genuinely do your best and still fail to save somebody. That final possibility hangs over the entire track. There is a sadness in accepting that you cannot control somebody else’s choices, particularly when those choices affect you deeply. Defects don’t turn that feeling into a grand declaration. They let it exist in all its frustration. The result is a song that feels less interested in providing answers than it is in accurately representing what it feels like to be left searching for them. And that is why this latest single works so well. It doesn’t require the listener to know the precise circumstances behind its creation. The emotional language is broad enough for almost anybody to find their own interpretation within it. Whether you have lost a friend, watched somebody change beyond recognition, experienced the end of a relationship or simply found yourself wondering whether you could have handled a situation differently, that central question is immediately understandable. As another glimpse into Artificial Icons, it also leaves plenty of anticipation for what the complete album will ultimately reveal. Defects appear increasingly comfortable allowing their songwriting to become more emotionally complex without abandoning the heaviness that brought people to them in the first place. That is a difficult balance to achieve, but Where Did I Go Wrong demonstrates that the band are becoming increasingly adept at it. Ultimately, this is not Defects attempting to reinvent themselves. It is something arguably more valuable: a band becoming more confident in what they already do and understanding how to make it mean more. The riffs still hit, the drums still carry that modern metalcore punch and the vocals still possess the strength expected from the band. But underneath all of that is a song about regret, helplessness and the deeply human need to understand why something went wrong. Sometimes there simply isn’t an answer. Sometimes all you are left with is the question. Where Did I Go Wrong is Defects turning that question into something heavy, melodic and genuinely affecting and it makes a compelling case that Artificial Icons could be their most emotionally developed record yet.

A Door You Can Never Close  by Those Made Broken

A Door You Can Never Close

ALBUM

Those Made Broken

4/5

There are records that arrive with the intention of making an impression and then there are records that feel as though they have simply reached the point where they needed to exist. A Door You Can Never Close, the second full length release from Those Made Broken, feels much closer to the latter. There is no sense of a band desperately trying to prove how heavy, clever or ambitious they can be. Instead, the album comes across as a collection of ideas that have been allowed to develop naturally, with the emphasis firmly placed on the impact of the songs themselves. What makes the record interesting is the way it refuses to sit comfortably inside one particular corner of rock music. There is plenty here for anyone who enjoys music with some weight behind it but calling it simply a heavy rock record would miss a lot of what gives it character. There is melody running through its foundations, alongside a darker alternative rock sensibility and an instinct for writing riffs that carry as much rhythm as they do distortion. It is music that can be forceful without needing to spend its entire running time trying to flatten everything in its path. That balance is established through the songwriting. The songs are constructed around recognisable ideas rather than technical demonstrations, and that gives the album an immediacy that becomes increasingly valuable as it progresses. You don’t get the feeling that the band are trying to make every individual moment compete for attention. Instead, sections are allowed to serve their purpose. A riff can establish the mood, a vocal can pull the listener further into it and a chorus can provide the release without everything needing to be turned up to eleven beforehand. It is that understanding of restraint that gives the heavier moments their effectiveness. When a record is permanently operating at maximum intensity, eventually the listener becomes accustomed to that level of energy. The impact disappears. Those Made Broken avoid that trap by allowing their music to move. There are moments of considerable weight but there is also space around them, and that space gives the album some much needed breathing room. The guitars are particularly effective in this respect. Rather than being used purely as a wall of sound, they often feel like separate parts of the same conversation. There is a willingness to let a riff establish a groove and sit there long enough for it to become part of the listener’s memory. That might sound like a fairly simple approach, but it is surprisingly difficult to get right. A riff has to be strong enough to carry repetition without becoming irritating, and these songs generally understand that distinction. There is also a pleasing sense of physicality to the music. Even away from its louder moments, the album feels driven by movement. The drums and bass provide a foundation that stops the guitars from becoming the entire story, and that rhythmic element gives the songs a sense of purpose. This is music that feels as though it should be experienced at volume, preferably in a room where the low end has somewhere to go. That live quality is one of the record’s more appealing characteristics. There is something inherently different about a band that sounds as though its songs have been built around the chemistry of musicians playing together rather than assembled piece by piece purely for the studio. A Door You Can Never Close has that sense of interaction. It isn’t sterile. It has enough movement in its performances to remind you that there are people behind the instruments. And that matters because the emotional side of the record depends on it. There is a persistent feeling of unease running underneath the album. It isn’t simply sadness, and it isn’t simply anger either. There is frustration, uncertainty and a sense of looking at the world around you and wondering how everything became quite so complicated. Those emotions give the heavier elements somewhere to come from. The aggression doesn’t feel like decoration, it feels like a response. The vocals are consequently central to the album’s personality. They don’t exist simply to deliver lyrics over the top of the guitars. There is enough variation in the delivery to allow the songs to move emotionally and that prevents the record from settling into one predictable vocal pattern. The more forceful passages have the necessary bite, but the moments where the intensity is reduced can be just as important because they allow the human side of the material to come forward. That human element is arguably where the album finds its strongest connection. There is no shortage of modern rock records concerned with a world that feels broken. It is an easy subject to approach, particularly at a time when there seems to be an endless supply of reasons to be angry. The challenge is making those feelings sound personal rather than generic. A Door You Can Never Close manages to give its frustrations a sense of lived experience. It doesn’t feel as though the band are standing outside the problems they are discussing and simply pointing at them. Instead, there is a feeling of being caught inside them. That makes the title particularly appropriate. A door that cannot be closed is a useful image for things that have changed permanently. Once something has been opened, discovered or set in motion, there is no guarantee that you can return to what existed beforehand. That idea can apply to personal experiences, relationships, society and technology alike and it gives the album a broader emotional identity without forcing every song into exactly the same subject. The record’s darker themes therefore never feel completely detached from its musical identity. The music and the subject matter are pulling in the same direction. When the guitars become heavier, the emotional pressure increases with them. When the arrangements open up, there is an opportunity for reflection. When the vocals become more restrained, the songs feel more exposed. That ebb and flow is what stops the album becoming exhausting. It also makes the melodic writing much more important than it might initially appear. The record has hooks but they aren’t there simply to make the songs commercially palatable. Melody becomes another way of expressing the emotions that the heavier passages cannot quite articulate. A memorable chorus can make frustration feel communal. A quieter vocal moment can turn something abstract into something personal. There is a certain confidence in allowing that to happen. The album doesn’t appear frightened of being accessible. That is worth mentioning because heavy music can sometimes fall into the trap of believing that anything melodic must automatically be less authentic. Those Made Broken don’t seem particularly interested in that argument. They understand that heaviness and melody can coexist quite comfortably, and the album is stronger because it refuses to treat them as opposites. That also gives the record a broader appeal than its heavier moments might initially suggest. Someone coming from alternative rock can find something familiar here, while listeners who prefer their guitars considerably more aggressive have enough weight to keep them interested. The music doesn’t need to announce which audience it belongs to. It simply plays. And that straightforwardness is one of the things that makes the album work. There are no moments where you get the impression that the band are adding complexity simply because they think they should. The arrangements feel purposeful. When something repeats, it generally has a reason to repeat. When a song changes direction, the change feels connected to what came before it. The result is an album that feels considerably more interested in songwriting than showing off. That isn’t to suggest that the music is simplistic. There is plenty happening beneath the surface, particularly in the way the rhythm section interacts with the guitars. It is just that the technical aspects never become the main attraction. You notice the song before you notice the construction. For a second album, that sense of identity is particularly encouraging. There is often a temptation for a band to make a follow up bigger in every conceivable way, more layers, more production, longer songs, louder guitars and increasingly elaborate arrangements. Those Made Broken seem to have taken a different route. Rather than simply expanding everything, the music feels more focused. That focus gives the album momentum. It also means the quieter sections are allowed to matter. They aren’t filler between the heavy parts. They are part of the reason the heavy parts work. Without that contrast, the album would lose some of its emotional shape. There is something almost cinematic about that approach at times. Not cinematic in the sense of huge orchestration or grandiose production, but in the way the music seems to understand atmosphere. Certain sections feel as though they are creating a physical environment around the listener. The guitars can become oppressive, then suddenly more open. The rhythm can drive forward, then settle back. The vocals can sound confrontational before becoming vulnerable. Those changes make the record feel alive. And perhaps that is the quality that stays with you most. A Door You Can Never Close isn’t perfect because it is trying to be perfect. It works because it has personality. You can hear the band’s preferences in it. You can hear the desire to write songs that work in a room full of people. You can hear the attraction to heaviness, but you can also hear an appreciation for melody and atmosphere. Most importantly, it doesn’t feel like the band are hiding behind their influences. There are recognisable ingredients throughout the record but the finished product doesn’t come across as an exercise in recreating someone else’s sound. Those influences have clearly been absorbed rather than copied, leaving the band room to establish their own voice. That voice is at its strongest when the record stops trying to categorise itself. It doesn’t need to be called alternative metal, heavy rock, modern rock or anything else. Those descriptions can be useful for finding the album, but they don’t really explain why it works. What matters is the combination of heaviness, melody and emotional directness. There is also an honesty in the way the album handles its darker ideas. It doesn’t pretend that there are easy answers waiting at the end of every song. Some things cannot simply be fixed. Some doors genuinely cannot be closed again. The album understands that reality without becoming completely defeated by it. That distinction gives the record its emotional balance. There is anger here but there is also reflection. There is darkness but there is also melody. There is heaviness but there is still room to breathe. And there is a sense throughout the album that the answer isn’t necessarily to go backwards and try to return to some imagined version of life before everything became complicated. Sometimes the only option is to acknowledge what has changed and keep moving. That makes A Door You Can Never Close feel surprisingly mature in its outlook. It isn’t a record screaming for attention simply because screaming is easy. It is a record that seems to understand why it wants to be loud in the first place. The strongest songs are therefore the ones where all of these elements meet, the guitars have enough weight to give the music physical presence, the rhythm section provides movement, the vocals give the material its emotional centre and the melodies provide something for the listener to carry away afterwards. That combination gives the album longevity. It is easy enough to imagine enjoying this record once and moving on. It is considerably easier, though, to imagine certain riffs, vocal lines and choruses finding their way back into your head later. That is often the real test of an album like this. Not whether it sounds impressive during the first listen, but whether something remains once the final note has disappeared. A Door You Can Never Close leaves something behind. It isn’t necessarily one enormous moment. It is more the cumulative effect of the record. The feeling of weight. The darker atmosphere. The melodic release. The sense of frustration underneath everything. The impression of a band that knows what it wants its music to feel like and has become increasingly comfortable expressing it. And perhaps that is why the album’s title works so well beyond its literal meaning. Those Made Broken have clearly opened another door with this record. Rather than attempting to recreate their first album or chase whatever direction might currently be fashionable, they’ve allowed themselves to move forward. The result feels like progression without abandoning the characteristics that made the band worth paying attention to in the first place. There is no need for grand claims about changing the face of rock music. There is no need to pretend this is something it isn’t. It is simply a confident, weighty and emotionally engaged rock record from a band that understands the value of a good song. Sometimes that is exactly what you want from an album. And A Door You Can Never Close leaves that door firmly open.

Pillow Talk by Sienna Skies

Pillow Talk

SINGLE

Sienna Skies

5/5

There is a certain confidence required for a band rooted in heavier music to deliberately take their foot off the accelerator. When a group has spent years establishing themselves through the energy, aggression and emotional immediacy associated with post hardcore and metalcore, there can be an understandable temptation to keep pushing in the same direction. Bigger riffs, heavier breakdowns, more aggressive vocals and increasingly elaborate production can become an easy way of demonstrating progression. But progression does not necessarily mean becoming heavier. Sometimes it means understanding what else your songwriting is capable of doing. That is where Sienna Skies latest single, Pillow Talk, becomes particularly interesting. Rather than arriving with the kind of immediate heaviness that listeners might naturally associate with the band, Pillow Talk takes a considerably more measured approach. It is a song built around atmosphere, melody and emotional tension, allowing the band to explore a softer and more vulnerable side of their sound without completely disconnecting themselves from the heavier foundations that have defined them. What could easily have felt like a dramatic left turn instead comes across as a natural extension of the band’s songwriting identity. The first thing that stands out is the sense of space. There is room within Pillow Talk. The instrumentation does not feel as though it is constantly fighting for the listener’s attention and that gives the individual components considerably more importance. The guitars can breathe, the vocals can sit more prominently within the arrangement and the rhythm section has the opportunity to provide movement without having to dominate every second of the song. That restraint is important because the emotional character of the track depends on it. Sienna Skies have clearly recognised that there is a different kind of power in holding something back. When a band is capable of producing enormous walls of sound, choosing not to do so can actually make the moments where that intensity returns feel considerably more significant. Pillow Talk understands that contrast. Rather than treating heaviness as the default setting, it uses dynamics to create a much broader emotional landscape. The guitars are central to that. There is still enough weight in their tone to remind you exactly where this band comes from, but the riffs are not simply being used as weapons. They contribute to the atmosphere just as much as they contribute to the song’s momentum. Melodic ideas have greater room to develop, and the guitar work becomes something that you can sit with rather than simply something designed to hit you. That distinction gives the track an unexpectedly intimate quality. The instrumentation feels deliberately controlled. There is a sense that every additional layer has a purpose, rather than the production simply attempting to make the song sound as large as possible. This gives Pillow Talk a clarity that works particularly well for the style Sienna Skies are exploring here. When the arrangement becomes fuller, it feels like an actual progression rather than another wall of sound being added because the chorus has arrived. It is an approach that makes the song feel considerably more mature. The vocals are arguably where that maturity becomes most apparent. With the instrumental pulling back, there is nowhere for the vocal performance to hide. On heavier material, aggressive instrumentation can naturally become part of the emotional delivery here, the voice has to carry much more of that responsibility. The performance therefore feels more exposed, allowing the emotional character of the song to come through without needing to rely on sheer volume. That works particularly well because Pillow Talk does not feel like it is chasing vocal perfection at the expense of personality. There is character in the delivery and that character is important. A song built around intimacy needs to sound human. If everything were excessively polished and clinically presented, some of the emotional impact would disappear. Instead, the vocals feel like they belong inside the song rather than simply sitting on top of it. That is one of the strongest aspects of the production as a whole. The track does not feel as though its melodic elements have been separated from the band’s heavier identity and presented as some completely different project. The two sides coexist. The vulnerability is allowed to exist alongside the weight, and that is ultimately what keeps Pillow Talk sounding like Sienna Skies. This is not a band attempting to disguise where they came from. It is a band demonstrating that they are not restricted by it. There is a significant difference. The alternative rock influence running through the song gives Sienna Skies another dimension without making the track feel deliberately commercial. It is accessible, certainly but accessibility is not the same thing as simplification. There are still enough layers within the arrangement to reward repeated listens, particularly because the song’s appeal comes as much from its atmosphere as its immediate hooks. That atmosphere is perhaps the defining feature of Pillow Talk. The title itself suggests intimacy, quiet conversations and the kind of emotional honesty that tends to exist away from the noise of everyday life. The music reflects that idea surprisingly well. There is a closeness to the arrangement that makes the song feel less like a performance directed towards a crowd and more like something being communicated directly to the listener. That is a difficult feeling to manufacture. It comes from giving the song enough room to breathe. Rather than constantly pushing towards the next major moment, Pillow Talk allows its emotional weight to develop gradually. This makes the track feel less concerned with immediate gratification and more interested in creating an atmosphere that the listener can actually inhabit. The longer runtime works in its favour here, because there is enough space for the song to develop rather than simply establishing an idea and rushing towards its conclusion. There is also something quite refreshing about that patience. Modern alternative music can sometimes feel as though every second has been engineered around retaining attention. A hook arrives quickly, the chorus appears early, the production constantly introduces another layer and the song moves on before the previous moment has had time to settle. Pillow Talk feels more comfortable allowing its ideas to exist. That does not mean the song lacks momentum. Quite the opposite. The rhythm section provides an understated sense of movement beneath everything else. The drums do not need to become excessively complicated to be effective, because their primary purpose is to support the emotional trajectory of the composition. When the arrangement grows, the rhythmic foundation helps make that growth feel earned. That understanding of dynamics is something Sienna Skies have clearly carried over from their heavier material. A band that comes from metalcore and post-hardcore naturally understands the importance of tension and release. Those genres are built around contrast, quiet and loud, melody and aggression, anticipation and payoff. Pillow Talk simply applies those principles in a more restrained environment. The result is that the song’s heavier elements, when they do emerge, have greater impact. That is one of the things that makes the track more compelling than a straightforward attempt at writing a softer song. There is still an underlying sense that something larger exists beneath the surface. The listener is never completely detached from the band’s heavier instincts. Instead, those instincts have been placed further back in the arrangement, waiting for the right moments to become apparent. It gives the song tension without requiring constant aggression. And that is probably the most convincing argument for this particular direction. Sienna Skies do not need to prove that they can write heavy music. Their existing identity already establishes that. What Pillow Talk proves is that they can remove some of those familiar tools and still construct a song that holds together. That is much harder than it sounds. Anyone can make a song louder. Creating impact without relying on volume requires considerably more discipline. The songwriting also benefits from not being overloaded. There is a strong sense of melody running throughout the track, but it does not feel like melody has simply been added to make the song more approachable. It is part of the composition from the beginning. The instrumental and vocal ideas appear to have been developed around the same emotional centre, which gives the finished track a sense of cohesion. That cohesion is particularly important because Pillow Talk could have easily become fragmented. There are several different aspects of Sienna Skies identity present here, the heavier guitar tones, the post hardcore sense of emotional urgency, the alternative rock influence, the melodic vocal writing and the more atmospheric production. In less confident hands, those ingredients could pull in different directions. Here, they mostly reinforce one another. The heavier elements give the softer passages credibility. The melodic sections make the heavier moments more meaningful. The atmospheric production creates the space for the vocals to become more intimate, while the band’s established sense of rhythm prevents the track from drifting too far into something completely detached from their roots. It is that balance that makes the song work. There is also an interesting sense of progression when considering where a song like this might sit within Sienna Skies broader catalogue. Rather than viewing Pillow Talk as a rejection of what came before it, it makes more sense to see it as the band widening the boundaries of their own sound. That is usually where the most interesting evolution happens. A band should be able to surprise its audience without making them wonder whether they are listening to an entirely different artist. Sienna Skies still sounds like Sienna Skies here. The difference is that the emphasis has shifted. The aggression has not disappeared, it has simply stopped being the sole focus. The guitars still carry weight, but melody is given equal importance. The vocals remain emotionally charged, but they are not required to fight against an enormous instrumental. The drums still provide energy, but they do not need to drive every section towards a breakdown. Everything feels slightly more considered. And that consideration gives Pillow Talk a real sense of emotional maturity. There is something particularly effective about the song refusing to overplay its hand. It does not need enormous dramatic gestures to communicate its mood. Instead, it relies on accumulation, the interaction between the guitars, the vocal performance, the rhythm section and the gradually developing arrangement. The emotional impact comes from the combination rather than any single moment. That is often the sign of strong songwriting. It also means the track should benefit from repeat listens. On an initial play, the most obvious feature is the shift towards a more melodic and alternative rock oriented sound. With subsequent listens, however, the smaller details within the arrangement become more noticeable. The spaces between parts, the way the guitars support the vocal melodies and the subtle changes in intensity all contribute to the overall character. There is enough happening beneath the surface to keep the song from becoming disposable. And that is important for a song operating in this particular space. If Pillow Talk had simply been a stripped-back, radio friendly version of Sienna Skies, it would probably have felt like a novelty. Instead, there is enough substance within the arrangement to suggest that this is a genuine direction the band is exploring. The fact that the song had already been introduced into their live environment before its formal release only makes that transition feel more convincing. There is a difference between writing a song that sounds good in a studio and writing one that can occupy a live set alongside heavier material. Pillow Talk has the kind of dynamic character that could make it particularly effective in that environment. In a live setting, the quieter nature of the song could actually become one of its greatest assets. When surrounded by heavier material, a song like this gives the audience somewhere to breathe. But more importantly, it gives the band somewhere to go. A set consisting entirely of maximum intensity can eventually flatten its own impact. When everything is loud, nothing is particularly loud anymore. When everything is aggressive, aggression becomes expected. A song that pulls the audience into a more intimate space can make the next heavy moment feel enormous. That makes Pillow Talk potentially valuable beyond the song itself. It adds another colour to Sienna Skies live and recorded identity. The production is similarly effective because it understands that atmosphere requires separation. The song does not feel excessively crowded, and that allows the listener to hear the relationship between the different components. The guitars have their own space, the vocals remain central and the rhythmic elements provide a foundation without constantly pulling focus. There is a warmth to the overall presentation that suits the song’s emotional direction. That warmth is important because it stops the track from feeling cold or overly clinical. The production may be polished, but it does not lose the sense that there is a band performing behind it. And that brings us back to the central strength of Pillow Talk. It feels genuine. There is no obvious sense of Sienna Skies attempting to tick a particular stylistic box. The song does not feel like an exercise in proving that a heavy band can write something melodic. Instead, it feels like a band following a particular songwriting instinct and allowing that instinct to dictate the arrangement. That is why the change in direction feels convincing. The best stylistic shifts tend to happen when an artist does not spend the entire song trying to convince you that they have changed. Sienna Skies simply let the music demonstrate it. What makes Pillow Talk especially worthwhile, then, is not that it is softer than some of the band’s other work. Softness alone is not particularly interesting. What matters is what the band does with that space. They use it to make the vocals more exposed. They use it to make the guitars more melodic. They use it to create genuine dynamic contrast. They use it to explore a different emotional register. And perhaps most importantly, they use it to demonstrate that their identity is considerably broader than simply being a heavy band. That is a meaningful step forward. There will undoubtedly be listeners who come to Sienna Skies primarily for the heavier side of their music, and Pillow Talk is not necessarily going to replace that part of the band’s appeal. It does not need to. Its purpose is almost the opposite. It demonstrates that the band can occupy another space when the song calls for it. That makes the single feel less like a departure and more like an expansion. The title Pillow Talk carries an expectation of intimacy, and the music manages to deliver on that expectation without becoming excessively sentimental. There is emotional weight here, but the song trusts its arrangement and performance enough not to spell everything out through constant musical exaggeration. That restraint is what ultimately makes it believable. Sienna Skies have created a track that feels comfortable sitting between alternative rock and their heavier post hardcore foundations. It has enough melody to reach beyond the band’s established audience, but enough character and weight to prevent existing listeners from feeling as though the band has suddenly abandoned everything that made them distinctive. It is a difficult middle ground to find. Pillow Talk finds it. More importantly, it suggests that Sienna Skies are entering an interesting period of their songwriting. If this is indicative of where they are willing to explore next, there is plenty of potential in the idea of allowing their melodic side to become a more significant part of their identity while retaining the intensity that has always sat underneath it. Because ultimately, Pillow Talk is not about Sienna Skies becoming less heavy. It is about them becoming more dynamic. It is about understanding that heaviness has more impact when it exists alongside vulnerability. That melody becomes more powerful when it comes from a band capable of aggression. That atmosphere can be just as important as distortion. And that sometimes the most convincing way to show progression is simply to reveal a side of yourself that has not previously been given quite so much room. There is a confidence in that approach. Sienna Skies have not thrown away their heavier identity with Pillow Talk, they have simply stepped outside of it for a moment and discovered that there is considerably more room for them to explore. And that makes this more than just a softer single. It feels like a glimpse at another side of what Sienna Skies can become.

Monsters We Made by Kris Barras Band

Monsters We Made

ALBUM

Kris Barras Band

5/5

There is a particular satisfaction in hearing a band arrive at a record that feels comfortable in its own skin. Not necessarily because everything has suddenly become bigger, heavier or more ambitious, but because the musicians finally seem to have found the point where all of their influences, experiences and previous musical decisions make sense together. That is the feeling that sits at the heart of Monsters We Made, the sixth studio album from Kris Barras Band. Released through Earache Records on 14 August 2026, the record finds a band with plenty of history behind them continuing to move forward without appearing particularly interested in abandoning the qualities that brought them here in the first place. What makes that particularly interesting is the route Kris Barras Band have taken to reach this point. There has always been a strong blues rock foundation beneath their music but their sound has progressively broadened into something considerably more muscular and modern. Halo Effect represented a particularly obvious shift towards heavier territory, and rather than simply following that path further, Monsters We Made feels as though the band have taken stock of everything that worked and everything that didn’t. The result isn’t a record that sounds like it is trying to outdo its predecessor by being relentlessly heavier. Instead, there is a much stronger sense of balance. The riffs can be enormous, the drums can hit with genuine force and the choruses can be huge but there is still room for groove, melody, atmosphere and, perhaps most importantly, vulnerability. That balance becomes apparent very quickly. Monsters We Made has a sizeable sound, but it doesn’t feel unnecessarily inflated. The guitars carry plenty of weight while retaining enough definition for the character of the playing to come through, and the rhythm section gives everything a physicality that makes the songs feel as though they are constantly pushing forward. There is a confidence to the production that allows the band to sound contemporary without stripping away the rougher edges that make Kris Barras Band recognisable in the first place. The album has clearly been built to work on a large stage, but it never feels as though the musicians have sacrificed their identity simply to make everything sound enormous. That is where the guitar work becomes particularly important. Kris Barras has always had the ability to bring a blues guitarist’s instinct for phrasing into heavier surroundings, and that remains one of the band’s greatest strengths. There are plenty of riffs here that carry the weight expected from modern hard rock, but they don’t sound like they could have been written by just about any contemporary rock band. There is still movement within them, still a sense of groove and still an appreciation for the spaces between the notes. The heavier tone doesn’t erase the blues influence, it simply gives it a different environment in which to exist. The partnership between Barras and Josiah J. Manning also gives the guitars a considerable amount of depth. Manning’s role in the production is particularly noticeable in how consistently the album sounds, while the playing itself avoids falling into the trap of turning every guitar moment into a technical demonstration. There are solos, certainly, and there are moments where the musicianship is allowed to take centre stage, but they generally feel like extensions of the songs rather than interruptions. That is an increasingly important quality in rock music. Technical ability is impressive but technical ability that serves the emotional character of a song is considerably more memorable. Underneath all of that, Frazer Kerslake and Billy Hammett give the album the kind of foundation it needs. The bass isn’t simply there to reinforce the guitar, it helps give the songs their depth, while Hammett’s drumming keeps the record moving without making every track feel as though it needs to race towards the next big moment. There is a noticeable emphasis on groove throughout Monsters We Made and that helps connect the band’s bluesier past with their more contemporary sound. The record can hit hard without becoming stiff and it can settle into a rhythm without losing its sense of momentum. That rhythmic quality is one of the things that makes the album more enjoyable the longer it plays. On an initial listen, the obvious attraction is the size of the sound and the strength of the choruses, but underneath that are a lot of small decisions that keep the songs moving. The band understand that a heavy riff doesn’t necessarily need to be played at maximum intensity to have impact. Sometimes allowing it to sit back slightly creates considerably more weight when everything eventually opens up again. That same understanding of restraint carries over into Kris Barras vocal performance. There is plenty of grit and power when the songs demand it, but one of the most effective aspects of his performance is the willingness to pull back. He doesn’t spend the entire record attempting to prove how hard he can sing. Instead, there are moments where the delivery becomes more exposed, allowing the emotion behind the words to come through without the safety net of a huge guitar arrangement. That becomes particularly important because Monsters We Made is not an album that relies solely on the usual hard rock language of defiance and bravado. There is certainly an element of fighting back throughout the record, but beneath that is a more complicated emotional thread. The album repeatedly circles ideas of isolation, frustration, confrontation, damaged relationships and the consequences of the things we create within ourselves. The title itself suggests something more inward looking than simply another collection of songs about overcoming external obstacles and that gives the record an interesting psychological undertone. It is not an album that wallows in those ideas, though. Even when the subject matter becomes darker, there is usually a sense of movement. These songs don’t feel trapped inside their own sadness. There is an instinct to push forward, to confront whatever is causing the problem and to keep going. That gives the heavier moments a purpose beyond simply sounding aggressive. The aggression feels like a response to something. This is also why the more melodic material works so well within the overall record. There are albums where a softer song feels like an interruption, almost as though the band have suddenly remembered that they need a ballad before returning to the heavier material. Monsters We Made is more convincing because the quieter moments feel like part of the same emotional journey. The record needs those moments. Without them, the heavier songs would inevitably begin to lose their impact simply through repetition. Unspoken is a particularly important part of that equation because it allows the emotional side of the band to come forward without being buried beneath the weight of the instrumentation. Likewise, Otherside provides another change in perspective, creating a more expansive and reflective atmosphere. Those moments give the album breathing room, and that breathing room ultimately makes the heavier material feel heavier. The contrast is what gives the record its shape. It is a simple principle, but one that plenty of bands forget, if everything is loud, nothing is loud. Kris Barras Band understand that. The result is an album that can move from an enormous hard rock passage into something much more intimate without the transition feeling like a change of artist. The underlying identity remains consistent. The same voice, the same guitar character and the same rhythmic sensibility are still there but they are being used differently. That sense of identity is probably the most impressive thing about Monsters We Made. The album doesn’t sound as though Kris Barras Band are trying to become somebody else. There are obvious reference points within the broader sound. You can hear the blues-rock background, the modern hard rock influence and the kind of arena sized songwriting that has become increasingly important to the band. But the combination feels specific enough to remain theirs. The guitars have personality, Barras voice has an instantly recognisable roughness and the songs are built around a mixture of groove and melody that keeps them connected to the band’s roots. It also helps that the band aren’t afraid of writing straightforward rock songs. There is sometimes a strange pressure within modern heavy music to make everything complicated, unexpected or technically elaborate. Monsters We Made doesn’t fall into that trap. There is nothing wrong with a chorus that simply works. There is nothing wrong with a riff that immediately makes sense. There is nothing wrong with writing a song that people can remember after hearing it once, In fact, that directness is one of the album’s biggest strengths. The hooks are strong without feeling manufactured, and the choruses have enough melodic lift to make the songs feel naturally anthemic. You can imagine the audience participation before you have even heard the songs live. That doesn’t make them simplistic. It means the songwriting has been stripped down to its most communicative elements. And that is where the album’s arena ambitions become believable. A record can be produced to sound enormous and still fail to feel like something that belongs in a large room. Monsters We Made has a different quality. The songs have enough space around them to grow when performed live, and the bigger moments feel designed to be shared rather than simply listened to. There is a sense of physical movement in the arrangements, from the way the drums drive the riffs to the way the guitars expand around the choruses. At the same time, the album doesn’t completely lose the intimacy that has always been part of the band’s appeal. That is a difficult balance to achieve. The further a rock band moves towards arenas, the greater the risk that the music becomes so polished and oversized that the listener feels disconnected from it. Here, the production remains clean and powerful, but there is still enough grit in the performances to remind you that this is a band playing together. That human quality matters particularly when the album becomes more emotional. Barras doesn’t sound like he is simply delivering lyrics because they are written on a page. There is a sense of lived in experience to the vocals and that gives the more vulnerable material considerably more weight. The record doesn’t need to explain every emotion to you. It gives enough space for the listener to bring their own experiences into it. There are inevitably, moments where the album’s reliance on established hard rock structures becomes apparent. This isn’t an experimental record and it isn’t trying to dismantle the conventions of the genre. There are familiar rises and falls, familiar approaches to choruses and moments where you can sense where a song is heading before it arrives. For listeners looking for constant surprises, that may limit the album’s impact But that isn’t really what Monsters We Made is trying to achieve. Its strength comes from execution. The band know the kind of music they want to make and they are increasingly good at making it sound convincing. The riffs have weight, the melodies have staying power, the rhythm section has groove and Barras has developed into a frontman who can carry both the biggest moments and the quieter ones. There is no obvious weak link holding the album back. More importantly, the songs complement each other. The record doesn’t feel as though it was assembled around a handful of singles with some additional material added afterwards. There is a genuine sense of progression through the eleven tracks. The heavier material establishes the band’s physical presence, the melodic material keeps the record accessible and the more vulnerable songs add emotional depth. By the time the album reaches its closing stages, those different elements feel like parts of the same picture rather than separate experiments. That cohesion is what ultimately makes Monsters We Made feel like a significant album for Kris Barras Band. It isn’t necessarily significant because it introduces an entirely new version of the band. In some respects, it does the opposite. It demonstrates that the different versions of Kris Barras Band that have existed over the years can actually coexist. The blues influence doesn’t need to disappear for the band to sound modern. The heavier material doesn’t need to dominate for them to sound powerful. The melodic side doesn’t need to be sacrificed for the riffs to retain their bite. Everything has its place. That gives the album a maturity that isn’t necessarily obvious on first listen. It is easy to hear the huge guitars and enormous choruses and simply think of Monsters We Made as another big modern hard rock record. Spend more time with it and the balance becomes much more interesting. The band are making choices based on what the songs require rather than what would make the biggest immediate impression. That is probably why the album feels more confident than desperate. There is no sense that Kris Barras Band need to prove that they can be heavier than before. They don’t need to prove that they can write an arena chorus. They don’t need to prove that Barras can play guitar. All of those things are already established Instead, the focus is on putting them together in a way that feels natural and that is exactly what Monsters We Made does. It takes the bluesy instincts that have always existed within the band’s music, adds the weight and production of contemporary hard rock, gives the songs enough melodic identity to stay with you and then allows the emotional material to interrupt the momentum at exactly the moments it needs to. The result is a record that feels substantial without becoming bloated and polished without becoming sterile. Most importantly, it feels like a record made by a band rather than a collection of performances built around one frontman. Kris Barras is obviously the central figure, but the album has a strong sense of collective identity. The guitars work together, the rhythm section has a clear role and the production gives every element enough room to contribute. That makes the finished product feel cohesive from beginning to end. There is a sense throughout Monsters We Made that Kris Barras Band have stopped worrying about which version of themselves they should be. They can be bluesy. They can be heavy. They can be melodic. They can be vulnerable. They can be loud enough to fill an arena. They can also strip everything back and let a song breathe. None of those things contradict the others anymore. That is perhaps the biggest achievement of the album. Monsters We Made doesn’t need to be the band’s most radical record to be one of their most convincing. It simply needs to demonstrate that the years of development have led somewhere, and it does exactly that. The influences are still visible, the heavier experimentation has left its mark and the songwriting has grown into something increasingly assured. There is a real sense of arrival here. Not the kind of arrival that suggests the journey is over but the kind that tells you the band finally understand the road they are travelling and for Kris Barras Band, that road leads towards a version of hard rock that is big without being hollow, melodic without losing its bite, rooted in the blues without sounding trapped by it and emotionally open without losing the swagger that has always been part of their identity. Monsters We Made is, above all else, a record that sounds comfortable with itself. The guitars have weight. The songs have hooks. The vocals have character. The quieter moments have purpose. The heavier moments have impact. Underneath all of it is the unmistakable feeling of a band that has spent years figuring out exactly what it wants to sound like. There is no need to turn every knob to maximum. There is no need to chase another identity. Kris Barras Band have found the space where all of their strengths can exist together, and Monsters We Made is what that space sounds like.

Get Your Music Reviewed

Send us your latest release

Social Media Links (optional)